Why Free Parking is Killing Cities
Alexandre Maciel
Mr. Roddy
18 January 2022
IHSS
Why Free Parking is Killing Cities
Donald Shoup, a professor at the University of California in Los Angeles believes that free parking is destroying economies, especially in big populous cities. In his book, The High Cost Against Free Parking, he underlines his concern towards the government giving away so much land towards free parking. There is an estimate of 250 million cars in the US, and over 2 billion parking spaces. That's over 1,000 square feet of parking for a car owner vs. 800 square feet of housing land for a person. Somehow, cities such as Manhattan and Brooklyn, still have incredible problems with free parking. This is because parking spaces are not distributed evenly amongst the population. Therefore, this can create crazy traffic situations, and a lot of pollution. One of Professor Shoup's studies concludes that over 60% of the pollution on Earth happens due to cars, and they are parked 95% of the time! This shows how bad free parking spots effect our world, and why meters would be a much effective way. For example, in Paris, Texas, Mayor Anne Hidalgo reduced over 140,000 free parking spots in order to create more favorable sidewalks, and bike lanes. She is helping rebuild the city, so anything is accessible within 15 of their home. Although removing cars is ultimately impossible, this is just one way that we can help prevent climate change, while also benefiting our environment. Although Professor Shoup is near the end of his life, and unable to spread his ideas, some of his students have created a Facebook group to help educate others about this problem. The group has 5,000 members, but many thousand more followers. Professor Shoup started writing his book in 1970, and only now, has his idea really ben taken in account.
The government has a part in this because they can decide whether they really want to charge for parking space in order to help our environment and save time for people. However, this could be a controversial decision when it reaches high leveled courts. I have a feeling that this could turn into a political decision between parties.
Comments
Post a Comment